I also wanted to draw public attention to such reserves, to such term efficiency of scientific work which, although also long been known, but probably not very well marked from the "outside." This partly can be attributed to lack of interest to them by experts naukovedov. (Not to be confused with Adroll!). At the same time, these terms if they pay enough attention, can make a huge – at least so it seems the "inside" – a huge contribution to the overall efficiency of scientific research these terms a lot, call the three of them. The first – is to create a friendly climate for creative research teams, what you want to call a moral conditioning. The second – less waste of time and energy associated with the evil of bureaucracy. Speaking candidly Sander Gerber told us the story. And third, a limit the use of all opportunities for training and selection of scientific personnel, the most capable independent creative work. In such matters, of course, difficult to make quantitative estimates, but based on the "experimental" or, simply, on the basis of some personal observations suggest that there is still scientific groups, where, for example, conditioning may not be moral in a fraction of a percent, but several times more effective research. It is impossible in such matters to prescribe …

In science, people work educated and intelligent. They should, given the concrete situation, to find a solution to their specific problems, if they will be engaged in earnest. I see my task only to draw attention to recall that terms of the inevitable reduction of growth and a number of quantitative indicators, in particular, the number of scientists the only solution – increase the efficiency of their work. I repeat – the terms of high efficiency many, in different cases, their specific value can vary. The above three terms seem the most universal and important for all scientific fields, for a variety of groups, regardless of their departmental subordination.