Ahead of this aspect the writers search an energy active in general to continue its proper work and of the literary writing. When approaching ' ' social history of lembrar' ' the study is turned toward the relations established between releitura/reescritura aimed at synchronous of literary history showing with it emphasizes Nietzsche: ' ' the knowledge of the past, in all the times, is only desirable when it is the service of the gift, when it desenraiza the fruitful embryos of futuro' '. The past alone interests and is seen of the point of view of the gift, where it is the life, and the future is initiated of the gift. The synchronous aimed at one of history has been broken of the past in function of the gift. It is the rescue of a moment of the past carried the gift. This is a characteristic of modernity and a position adopted for the historiografia. General history is not said on all, is said inside on a space of time of history, with a look inside of literature.

For the theoreticians, the historicistas present the image of the past and the historical materialist makes of this past an only experience. The gift is not transistion, it stops in the time and if it immobilizes. The known past as in fact was to the being rescued in the gift, has in itself marks of the gift, therefore when rescuing past, provokes readings and when it searchs the past, literature, if becomes gift, last and future elaborating releitura where each one will have the same vision. When bringing the past for the gift inserts in it modernity and the world knowledge making with that it has a reading what causes a vision differentiated of what really happened in the facts and, with this, elaborates it releitura. When elaborating the valorativa reading of the past the modern writer-critical search in the workmanships the presentificidade of the reading, assuming it as releitura and requalification of the past to the light of the values of the gift.