By means of the logic and of the paralgica if she searchs to know, it not to be, but be-for of the things, therefore they only can be understood when related to the target, in an end relation/half. Rudolf thus here said express Ihering: ‘ ‘ The rock does not fall with the purpose to fall, but because it must, i.., for having to it been removed the support; the man, however, that he acts, makes not in one reason? why? , but of one? so that? in such a way, to obtain algo.’ ‘ Of the displayed one, it is clearly that in science and the philosophy, the nexus is ntico (object/idea), and in a technology, the nexus is dentico (end/half). The distinction is basic. Stammler, in its theory of the legal knowledge, distinguishes the knowledge that searchs knowing, and what it searchs acting. The first one is accessible in function of the causalidade; already as it is intelligible while half-for-end. Then it only earns sensible and it can be studied as pure form, composing a knowledge in genere, certain uniform and.

5.3 – The directed technological knowledge beyond, is critical, is empirical, is pragmatic. Critic, in the measure where its affirmations if base on rational arguments, and is accepted or not for the induced persuation. Empiricist, for elapsing of the experience, the comment. Pragmatic, when he is evaluated by the results, exclusively. Technological knowledge is not the same thing that technique, mere set of practical recommended, efficient, to be followed, that they are happened again, without more inquiry. Thus, the pianstica technique is not the same thing that the musical art, this yes a technological knowledge. The technique alone indicates which half ones is necessary to use for the achievement of a target, where measured degree or is valid, its meaning is purely instrumental.